Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

[Metallic 3d Number Ten On Smooth Blue Surface With Soft Reflection] sankai/iStock via Getty Images

Wall Street’s recent pullback has pushed a growing number of S&P 500 (SP500 [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SP500]) constituents into oversold territory, highlighting areas of the market that have experienced some of the sharpest selling pressure since the benchmark index peaked at a record 7,620.

The S&P 500 has declined approximately 4.6% from its high, falling to around 7,265 as investors navigated a period of heightened volatility and broad-based weakness across equities. The retreat has weighed heavily on several individual stocks, driving technical indicators to levels often associated with stretched downside momentum.

One of the most closely watched measures of market sentiment, the relative strength index, suggests that a number of large-cap names have become deeply oversold. An RSI reading below 30 is commonly viewed by technical analysts as a signal that selling pressure may have become excessive.

Among the S&P 500 stocks showing the weakest momentum, Trimble (TRMB [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/TRMB]) currently ranks as the most oversold member of the S&P 500, posting an RSI reading of 25.85.

Outlined below are the top 10 most oversold names in the benchmark index:

* Trimble (TRMB [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/TRMB]) — RSI 25.85
* PayPal Holdings (PYPL [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/PYPL]) — RSI 27.16 
* Mosaic (MOS [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/MOS]) — RSI 27.29
* Tyson Foods (TSN [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/TSN]) — RSI 28.02 
* Albemarle (ALB [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ALB]) — RSI 28.30
* Gilead Sciences (GILD [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/GILD]) — RSI 29.25
* Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/JKHY]) — RSI 29.34
* GE Vernova (GEV [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/GEV]) — RSI 29.35 
* Global Payments (GPN [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/GPN]) — RSI 29.47
* Corteva (CTVA [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/CTVA]) — RSI 29.59 

S&P 500 FUNDS: (SPY [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SPY]), (VOO [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/VOO]), (IVV [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/IVV]), (RSP [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/RSP]), (SSO [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SSO]), (UPRO [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/UPRO]), (SH [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SH]), (SDS [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SDS]), (SPXU [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SPXU]), (FXAIX [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/FXAIX]), (VFIAX [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/VFIAX]), (VFFSX [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/VFFSX]), and (SWPPX [https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/SWPPX]).

MORE ON MARKETS

* Over 40% of S&P 500 stocks trade below their 200-day MA amid selloff [https://seekingalpha.com/news/4602308-over-40-of-sp-500-stocks-trade-below-their-200-day-ma-amid-selloff]
* Market pullback is viewed as a healthy pause, Morgan Stanley says [https://seekingalpha.com/news/4602221-market-pullback-is-viewed-as-a-healthy-pause-morgan-stanley-says]
* 15 dividend stocks to watch as downward momentum grips Wall Street [https://seekingalpha.com/news/4602204-15-dividend-stocks-to-watch-as-downward-momentum-grips-wall-street]
* Gold sinks to its lowest recorded level since November [https://seekingalpha.com/news/4602152-gold-sinks-to-its-lowest-recorded-level-since-november]
* Silver falls below 200-day MA, down 45% from its record high set earlier this year [https://seekingalpha.com/news/4601860-silver-falls-below-200-day-ma-down-45-percent-from-its-record-high-set-earlier-this-year]

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

Bill Nygren hat kürzlich das N-PORT-Filming für das erste Quartal 2026 eingereicht, wodurch Einblicke in seine Investitionsentscheidungen während dieser Periode gewährt werden. ... (übersetzt weiter)

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

Die Märkte gehen in die Begegnung zwischen Donald Trump und Xi Jinping mit wichtigen US-Aktien nahezu an Rekordhöhen vorbei. Die nächsten beiden Tage könnten ein neuer Test für Investoren sein, die bisher ruhig geblieben sind. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) stieg um 1,9% nach dem Treffen von Co-Gründer Jensen Huang mit Trumps China-Reise als letzte Minute-Ergänzung. Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU), Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) und Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) stiegen ebenfalls an. Piper Sandler-Daten zeigen, dass der S&P 500 um etwa 0,7% auf beiden Donnerstag und Freitag bewegt werden könnte, weniger als die erwartete Bewegung in chinesischen Internet-Aktien über denselben Zeitraum und weniger als die erwartete Bewegung im Index nach Nvidias Earnings nächste Woche. Der Gipfel ist wichtig, weil Investoren möglicherweise unterbewerten, wie viel noch schief gehen könnte. Die Gespräche sollen sich auf Zölle, Iran, Luftfahrt, landwirtschaftliche Produkte, kritische Mineralien und Technologie konzentrieren, was mehreren großen Sektoren einen direkten Zugang zu positiven oder negativen Schlagzeilen gibt. Danny Kirsch von Piper Sandler sagte, dass alles, was nicht positiv für Technologie- und AI-Aktien im Zusammenhang mit US-China-Handelsbeziehungen ist oder erneute Spannungen im Iran, wahrscheinlich schlecht aufgenommen werden würde. Boeing (NYSE:BA) könnte eines der am engsten beobachteten Namen sein, da China einen Deal über etwa 500 Boeing 737 Max-Airfahrtzeuge in Betracht zieht, während CEO Kelly Ortberg sagte, dass Trumps Besuch eine bedeutsame Gelegenheit sein könnte. Bloomberg Intelligence-Analyst George Ferguson sagte, dass es wahrscheinlich ist, dass ein Boeing-Order bekannt gegeben wird, obwohl jeder Einfluss auf Boeings Einnahmenstatement möglicherweise Zeit brauchen oder nicht passieren würde. Der Gipfel könnte auch für Landwirtschaft, seltene Erden und Halbleiter wichtig sein, wo sogar kleine Verschiebungen möglicherweise den Sentiment bewegen könnten. Eine chinesische Zusage, US-Landwirtschaftsprodukte zu kaufen, könnte amerikanischen Bauern helfen und möglicherweise Namen wie Deere (NYSE:DE) und Corteva (NYSE:CTVA) heben, da Mais und Soja Teil der Diskussionen sind, laut Händlern, die über den Gegenstand informiert wurden. In kritischen Mineralien könnte ein Abkommen über seltene Erden-Flüsse für MP Materials (NYSE:MP) Risiken schaffen, das nach dem Pentagon-Einlage mehr als 100% gestiegen ist, während die US-Regierung auch Anteile an USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ:USAR), Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) und Trilogy Metals (TMQ) hat. Für Chips könnte Chinas Zugang zu AI-Halbleitern auf dem Tisch liegen, nachdem Nvidia einen Lizenzbrief für die Verkauf weniger fortgeschrittener Prozessoren in China erhalten hatte. Scott Ladner von Horizon Investments sagte, dass Nvidias Ausblick annimmt, es gäbe keine China-Verkäufe, was bedeutet, dass eine erhebliche Änderung möglicherweise die Erwartungen an den Bedarf für das breitere Halbleiter-Industrie ändern könnte.

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

Ein bevorstehendes Treffen zwischen US-Präsident Donald Trump und seinem chinesischen Amtskollegen Xi Jinping könnte das nächste Test für Aktien sein, die sich immer wieder neue Rekorde holen.

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

Der State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF bietet eine erheblich niedrigere Gebührenquote und höhere Dividendenrendite als der Invesco Food & Beverage ETF. Der Invesco Food & Beverage ETF konzentriert sich auf eine enge Auswahl von Wertpapieren mit Hilfe einer dynamischen Indexstrategie, während der State Street-Fonds einen breiten Einblick in den S&P 500-Stapels-Sektor bietet. Obwohl beide Fonds ähnliche Volatilitätsprofile mit Betas um 0,50 aufweisen, verwaltet der State Street-Fonds 14,6 Milliarden US-Dollar an Vermögenswerten gegenüber 94,1 Millionen US-Dollar für den Invesco-Fonds. Der State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEMKT:XLP) bietet einen breiten und günstigen Zugang zu großen Kapitalstapels-Unternehmen, während der Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (NYSEMKT:PBJ) eine konzentrierte Strategie mit höheren Gebühren anbietet, die sich auf bestimmte Lebensmittelindikatoren konzentriert.

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF(NYSEMKT:XLP) and the Invesco Food & Beverage ETF(NYSEMKT:PBJ) both deliver exposure to U.S. consumer staples, but with a few notable differences.

XLP charges lower fees, yields more, and aims for broad, low-cost coverage of the consumer staples sector -- while PBJ zeroes in on food and beverage companies.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric XLP PBJ Issuer State Street Invesco Expense ratio 0.08% 0.61% 1-yr return (as of 4/2/26) 2.6% 8.0% Dividend yield 2.4% 1.6% Beta 0.59 0.72 AUM $17.6 billion $89.7 million

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

XLP is notably cheaper, with an expense ratio of 0.08% compared to PBJ’s 0.61%. XLP also offers a higher dividend yield at 2.4%, while PBJ’s payout sits at 1.6% -- a meaningful difference for income-focused investors.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric XLP PBJ Max drawdown (5 y) -16.32% -15.83% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,370 $1,327

PBJ has the edge on recent one-year performance, though XLP is slightly ahead on five-year total return. Both funds carry betas below 1.0, meaning they tend to move less dramatically than the broader market -- a feature that makes consumer staples ETFs a popular choice during periods of economic uncertainty.

What's inside

PBJ holds around 30 stocks, focusing on food and beverage companies, but with a tilt toward agricultural inputs and food distribution. Its largest positions include Corteva(NYSE:CTVA), Kroger(NYSE:KR), and Archer-Daniels-Midland(NYSE:ADM). This approach may appeal to those seeking targeted exposure with some diversification beyond pure consumer defensive names. PBJ's focus is the narrower of the two funds.

XLP, by contrast, holds 35 stocks and tracks the S&P’s consumer staples sector, with holdings spread across household products, personal care, and retail giants. Top positions include Walmart(NASDAQ:WMT), Costco Wholesale(NASDAQ:COST), and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)-- with those three companies alone making up 29% of the portfolio. With bets across the full consumer staples sector, XLP is a good fit for investors seeking broad blue chip exposure without sector drift.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Consumer staples ETFs don't typically generate headlines for explosive growth -- and that's kind of the point. In an environment where inflation is pressuring household budgets and investors remain cautious, defensive sector funds like XLP and PBJ are drawing renewed interest as portfolio stabilizers.

Story Continues

The choice between the two ultimately comes down to what you're optimizing for. If cost efficiency and income are priorities, XLP is hard to argue against. At just 0.08% annually, it's one of the cheapest ways to get diversified exposure to this sector -- and its 2.4% yield beats XLP’s 1.6%. Its holdings represent some of the most resilient businesses in the U.S. economy, the kinds of companies that tend to hold up even when consumers pull back on discretionary spending.

PBJ makes a different case. Its tighter focus on the food and beverage industry has helped it beat XLP over the past year. For investors who believe food companies are particularly well-positioned right now, that specificity could be attractive. Just know you'll pay more for it: PBJ’s 0.61% expense ratio is nearly eight times XLP's fee.

For most long-term investors prioritizing simplicity and low cost, XLP's profile is tough to beat. PBJ is better suited for those with a stronger conviction in food and beverage companies -- and the patience to look past a higher fee and lower yield.

Should you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $515,294! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,077,442!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 914% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 2, 2026.

Andy Gould has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Kroger. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

PBJ vs. XLP: Which Consumer Staples ETF Is the Better Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool

View Comments

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

Zusammenfassung (maximal 500 Wörter)

Dieser Artikel vergleicht zwei ETFs, die auf den US-Consumer-Staples-Sektor abzielen: den Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) und den Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Beide zielen darauf ab, Einblicke in Unternehmen zu geben, die lebensnotwendige Güter wie Lebensmittel, Haushaltswaren und Körperpflegeprodukte herstellen. Sie unterscheiden sich jedoch in ihrem Ansatz.

Wesentliche Unterschiede:

• PBJ’s Fokus: PBJ konzentriert sich speziell auf Lebensmittel- und Getränkeunternehmen und passt sein Portfolio vierteljährlich an. Es ist stark in diesem Sektor vertreten, mit einem Portfolio von nur 31 Aktien.
• FSTA’s breiter Ansatz: FSTA verfolgt einen breiteren Ansatz und verfolgt einen breiteren Index von Consumer-Staples-Aktien, mit 97 Long- und 1 Short-Position, die insgesamt 99 % seines Portfolios ausmachen. Dies bietet eine deutlich größere Diversifizierung.

Kosten und Leistung:

FSTA ist deutlich günstiger, mit einer Kostenquote von 0,08 % im Vergleich zu PBJ’s 0,61 %. Es bietet auch eine höhere Dividendenrendite (2,22 % gegenüber 1,54 %). In den letzten fünf Jahren hat FSTA PBJ übertroffen und eine stärkere Rendite erzielt (1.415 $ gegenüber 1.320 $ für eine Investition von 1.000 $). Die breitere Diversifizierung von FSTA ist der Haupttreiber dieser Leistung.

Risiko und Kennzahlen:

Beide ETFs weisen ähnliche Risiken auf, wie durch ihre fünfjährige maximale Korrektur (16,5 % für FSTA und 15,8 % für PBJ) angezeigt. Beta, ein Maß für die Volatilität im Verhältnis zum S&P 500, ist ebenfalls vergleichbar (0,63 für FSTA und 0,72 für PBJ).

Halterungen:

FSTA’s Top-Halterungen umfassen große Einzelhandelsriesen wie Walmart, Costco und Procter & Gamble, sowie kleinere Einlagen in Haushaltswaren, Tabak und Körperpflege. PBJ’s Halterungen werden von Lebensmittel- und Agrarunternehmen (Corteva, Kroger, Archer-Daniels-Midland) dominiert.

Investor Implikationen:

FSTA scheint für Investoren, die einen diversifizierten Consumer-Staples-ETF suchen, eine attraktivere Option zu sein, aufgrund seiner niedrigen Kosten, höheren Rendite und der überlegenen historischen Leistung. Seine breiteren Halterungen bieten eine bessere Sichtbarkeit auf verschiedene Teilbereiche des Consumer-Staples-Sektors. Der Artikel deutet darauf hin, dass FSTA sein Leistungspotenzial potenziell weiter ausbauen kann, wenn die Wirtschaft sich verbessert, insbesondere für seine Einzelhandelsbestände.

Haftungsausschluss: Die Motley Fool empfiehlt sowohl ETFs (obwohl es FSTA nicht in ihren Top 10 Aktienempfehlungen aufnehmen).

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF(NYSEMKT:VDC) and the Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (NYSEMKT:PBJ) both offer exposure to U.S. consumer staples companies, but their approaches and portfolios look quite different. This comparison explores each ETF’s fees, performance, risk, and holdings to help investors decide which may be a better fit for their goals.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric VDC PBJ Issuer Vanguard Invesco Expense ratio 0.09% 0.61% 1-yr return (as of 4/1/26) 4.4% 7.9% Dividend yield 1.95% 1.61% Beta 0.63 0.72 AUM $9.9 billion $89.7 million

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

VDC is significantly cheaper, with an expense ratio of 0.09%, compared to PBJ’s 0.61%. VDC also offers a higher dividend yield at 1.95%, while PBJ pays 1.61% -- a notable gap for income-focused investors.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric VDC PBJ Max drawdown (5 y) -16.56% -15.83% Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,421 $1,321

What's inside

PBJ focuses narrowly on 30 or so U.S. food and beverage companies, making it far less diversified than many sector ETFs. Its top holdings -- including Corteva(NYSE:CTVA), Kroger(NYSE:KR), and Archer-Daniels-Midland(NYSE:ADM) -- show a tilt toward agricultural inputs and food distribution.

VDC, by contrast, covers more than 100 stocks spanning the entire consumer defensive sector, with heavy weights in Walmart(NASDAQ:WMT), Costco Wholesale(NASDAQ:COST), and Procter & Gamble(NYSE:PG). This broader approach includes not just the food and beverage category, but also household and personal products, offering broader diversification across the consumer staples sector.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Consumer staples -- the category covering everyday essentials like food, beverages, and household products -- tend to hold up relatively well during economic downturns, which is a big part of their appeal. But not all ETFs are built the same.

The cost gap alone is striking. PBJ's 0.61% expense ratio is nearly seven times higher than VDC's 0.09%. For long-term investors, that expense drag compounds quietly over time -- and becomes harder to justify when VDC also delivers a higher dividend yield. Income-oriented investors, in particular, will likely find VDC the more rewarding choice.

The trade-off with PBJ is focus. If you have strong conviction that food and agricultural supply chains are poised to outperform broader consumer spending -- perhaps due to commodity price trends, food inflation, or structural shifts in how Americans eat -- PBJ's concentrated bet could make sense. Its stronger 1-year return suggests it can outperform in the right environment.

Story Continues

For most investors, though, VDC's combination of low cost, higher yield, greater diversification, and stronger long-term track record makes it the more sensible option. It captures the defensive characteristics investors seek from the consumer staples sector without doubling down on any single corner of it.

As always, the best ETF is the one that fits your broader portfolio -- not just the one with the flashiest recent return.

Should you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $515,294! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,077,442!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 917% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 2, 2026.

Andy Gould has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Kroger. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

VDC vs. PBJ: Is Broader Consumer Staples Exposure the Better Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool

View Comments

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

The Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (NYSEMKT: PBJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEMKT: RSPS) both target the consumer sector. Still, PBJ charges a higher fee and is more narrowly focused on food and beverage stocks. It has outperformed RSPS over the past year, while RSPS leads on yield and broader staples exposure.

Both PBJ and RSPS are designed for investors seeking access to U.S. companies in the food, beverage, and consumer staples space, but their approaches and costs differ. This comparison looks at how each fund stacks up on expenses, returns, risk, and portfolio makeup to help investors decide which may better fit their goals.

Snapshot (cost & size)

Metric RSPS PBJ Issuer Invesco Invesco Expense ratio 0.40% 0.61% 1-yr return (as of 2026-03-31) (1.5%) 8.2% Dividend yield 2.84% 1.54% Beta 0.62 0.72

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

PBJ carries a higher expense ratio than RSPS, making RSPS the more affordable option. RSPS also offers a higher dividend yield, which may appeal to income-focused investors, while PBJ’s lower yield could be less attractive for those who need extra income.

Performance & risk comparison

Metric RSPS PBJ Max drawdown (5 y) (18.6%) (15.8%) Growth of $1,000 over 5 years $1,064 $1,320

What's inside

PBJ tracks a dynamic index of 30 U.S. food and beverage companies focused on food, beverage, agriculture, and related technologies. The fund has nearly 21 years of operating history. Its top holdings are currently Corteva(NYSE:CTVA), Kroger(NYSE:KR), and Archer-Daniels-Midland(NYSE:ADM) . These stocks reflect a mix of agricultural and retail exposure, adding modest diversification beyond pure staples. The fund rebalances quarterly in Feb., May, Aug, and Nov.

By contrast, RSPS is more diversified across the consumer staples sector. It is an equal-weighted portfolio of 35 S&P 500 consumer staples stocks. Top holdings include Brown-Forman (NYSE: BF-B), Tyson Foods(NYSE:TSN), and Mondelez International(NASDAQ:MDLZ). In addition to food stocks, the fund also includes exposure to other parts of the sector, such as tobacco and household products.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

RSPS has key advantages over PBJ, including a broader investment mandate across consumer staples, lower costs, and higher yields. The latter two will obviously appeal to an investor looking to diversify into consumer staples with a high-yielding, low-volatility fund. RSPS checks those boxes.

Story Continues

But PBJ shows why its more thematic approach can outperform. Its selection of food and beverage stocks delivered stronger returns over the past five years. This suggests its food-and-beverage focus was more resilient during this period of elevated inflation and interest rates.

However, investors shouldn’t assume PBJ will always outperform. Its superior gains were driven by special economic circumstances that may fade, allowing RSPS’ broader mandate in more growth-oriented industries to shine. For example, its exposure to household products, beauty care, and retail stocks could benefit in a roaring economy.

Should you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Invesco Food & Beverage ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $518,530! Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,069,165!

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 915% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 1, 2026.

John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Kroger. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

PBJ vs. RSPS: Which Consumer Staples ETF Is the Better Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool

View Comments

Haftungsausschluss: Der Text wurde mit Hilfe einer KI zusammengefasst und übersetzt. Für Aussagen aus dem Originaltext wird keine Haftung übernommen!

Jim Cramer reviewed Corteva, Inc. (NYSE:CTVA) while breaking down 16 stocks for a market facing higher energy costs and economic uncertainty. Toward the end of the lightning round, a caller asked for Cramer’s thoughts on the stock, and he said:

Okay, it’s an ag stock. We all know that crop protection and seeds are going to be very important this year because of what’s happened to the Gulf. I would continue to own the stock.

Photo by Adam Nowakowski on Unsplash

Corteva, Inc. (NYSE:CTVA) provides advanced seeds and trait technologies that are designed to help farmers improve crop yields and protect against weather and pests. The company also offers products like herbicides and insecticides. Hardman Johnston Global Equity Strategy stated the following regarding Corteva, Inc. (NYSE:CTVA) in its fourth quarter 2025 investor letter:

During the quarter we liquidated Corteva, Inc. (NYSE:CTVA), T-Mobile US, Inc. and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. We exited our position in Corteva Inc. following management commentary around a potential separation of the Seeds and Crop Protection businesses, as we struggle to see a clear value-creation rationale given Corteva already trades at one of the richer multiples in the ag/chem peer group. While the Seeds business (c. two-thirds of profits) may command a premium multiple, this would likely be offset by a materially lower valuation for the Chemicals business, resulting in limited net value unlock. The separation narrative also raises strategic credibility concerns, as it appears inconsistent with prior management messaging around the complementary nature of Seeds and Chemicals on a single platform, as well as the long-term growth potential of higher-margin areas such as biologicals within Crop Protection. WSJ commentary suggesting a separation could be aimed at insulating the Seeds franchise from potential liabilities in the Chemicals business introduces additional uncertainty. At the same time, end-market fundamentals are becoming less supportive. U.S. corn acreage has risen to peak levels, increasing the risk of a sharp price correction if supply proves difficult to absorb, while soybean markets also face challenges given their reliance on exports and lower demand from China. Depressed farm economics over a prolonged period could pressure farmer spending on inputs. Taken together — elevated valuation, strategic uncertainty, and deteriorating agricultural fundamentals — we viewed the risk-reward as less compelling and chose to exit the position. We will be watching developments closely as the Seeds business is a truly unique franchise with high entry barriers and technological innovation.

Story Continues

While we acknowledge the potential of CTVA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 15 Stocks That Will Make You Rich in 10 Years

Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.

View Comments